Site icon PROMETHEUS

Plant root and microbial associations within macropores

Protocol

Author

Alain Pierret

Additional Authors:

C.E. Pankhurst, B.G. Hawke & J.M. Kirby

Overview

Protocol to determine the metabolic potential and functional diversity of the bacterial communities associated with plant roots located within macropores

Background

Up to 80% of the plant root system may be preferentially located within or closely associated with the macropores (within 1-10 mm), a zone defined as the macropore sheath (Stewart et al., 1999). It has been demonstrated (Pierret et al., 1999; Pankhurst et al., 2002) that the macropore sheath is both chemically and microbiologically different from the bulk soil. More research is required to understand the relationship between the size and activity of the microbial communities within the macropore sheath and root distribution within the soil profile, with increasing soil depth. This protocol explains how to sample and characterize these microbial communities.

Materials/Equipment

Units, terms, definitions

Macropore sheath (MPS) soil

Macropore root (MR) soil

Colony Forming Units (CFU)

The MPS refers to the soil around macropores in which roots are predominantly located (Stewart et al., 1999)

Procedure

I – Collection and dissection of soil specimens


Figure 1 Roots (R) within a macropore. Macropore sheath (MPS) soil includes the inside of the macropore wall and soil extending 1-3 mm into the soil matrix. Bulk soil (BS) is collected >10 mm from the macropore.
Figure 2 Clumping of roots (white arrow) within a macropore. The black arrows show small soil aggregates that are associated with the roots within the macropore. These aggregates are referred to as macropore root (MR) soil. II – Enumeration of microbial functional groups Preparation of culturable populations

Preparation of selective media, Inoculation and incubation

III – Substrate utilization patterns using Biolog GN plates (Biolog, Hayward, CA)

Notes and troubleshooting tips

Links to resources and suppliers

Oxoid Pseudomonas agar base

Biolog GN plates – Biolog, Hayward, CA

Literature references

Ali-Shtayeh M S, Len L-H C and Dick M W 1986 An improved method andmedium for quantitative estimates of Pythium species from soil. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 86, 39-47.

Gupta V V S R and Roper M M 1994 A most-probable-number method to enumerate the populations of cellulolytic bacteria and fungi in soils. In Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Framing Systems, Poster Papers. Ed.

Pankhurst C E. pp 115-117. CSIRO, East Melbourne.

Pankhurst C E, Hawke B G, McDonald H J, Kirkby C A, Buckerfield J C, Michelsen P, O’Brien K A, Gupta V V S R and Doube B M 1995 Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health. Aust. J. Expt. Agric. 35, 1015-1028.

Schmidt E L and Belser L W 1994 Autotrophic nitrifying bacteria. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Editorial committee R W Weaver chair. Pp 159-178.

Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison WI.

Stewart J B, Moran C J and Wood J T 1999 Macropore sheath: quantification of plant root and soil macropore association. Plant Soil 211, 59-67.

Health, safety & hazardous waste disposal considerations

 

Exit mobile version